
The topic of wolves and their presence throughout the northern USA is always a topic of debate. Which specific topic varies based on the individuals talking.
Among farmers the debate is heavily around their livestock. Among homeowners the debate is about their safety and the safety of their canine friends. Within the political arena, the debate is around "endangered" versus "managed". And with hunters the debate is about the affects on wildlife populations.
About 9 years ago, I was positive I saw a wolf during a deer drive as I was sneaking through the woods during WI whitetail firearm season. In our deer cabin in northern WI, the topic has come up in discussions with other hunters and especially when we see tracks in the snow which we debate over whether it is a large coyote or wolf. Until recently, we never added to the discussion the topic of their impact to the deer herd, it was always about the fact that the wolf packs introduced were finally making their way to our area of WI. Maybe that was due to the lack of deer population which already existed due to the lack of forestry management in the National forests.
The WI DNR does a very good job in recording and publicizing the impact to our canine friends and the safety precautions hunters and homeowners need to make in wolf populated areas. Prior to heavy populations of people in the United States, wolves were very prevalent throughout the northern states. As humans moved westerly and northerly, wolves were killed to protect livestock, people, wildlife, and for their hides. This caused the wolf populations to decrease to a danger of extinction. Here is where the debate starts. Some people would say "Good" as what benefits do wolves play in a nation of people and hunters. Human hunters are decent predators to wildlife populations; however, before human civilization, wolves were necessary to maintain healthy wildlife herds to avoid disease and over population. But there is just as large of a group of people (mostly those who do not live in wolf populated areas) who feel this majestic animal requires protection (which I do not disagree with) to keep them from becoming extinct. However, I am also in the opinion that human, livestock, pets, and wildlife preservation is more important and as wolf packs grow so does the safety of those four categories of living beings.
When I enjoyed the outdoors as a child and young man my only concern was the presence of black bears, but now I also need to be concern with the growing population of wolves. Bears are most dangerous when you are in the presence of a sow and her cub(s). So it is easy to recognize and avoid these situations. Wolves are also most dangerous in the presence of their pups. However, wolves are different. They hunt primarily in packs and when in packs are afraid of very little. "Strength in numbers." That statement is true with all living organisms. My neighbor of my wooded property in northern MN had an interesting experience this fall with a pack of wolves miles away from our land on some public land as they were bear hunting. He was sitting in a tree and heard the howls of wolves in all directions from a distance (miles). As the evening went on, the howling came closer until he was surrounded. Needless to say he felt very uncomfortable and phoned numerous friends to come and assist him to get out of the woods. WOW. That was my first reaction to this story when I heard it. My next reaction was WHY? Why do we continue to protect animals who threaten the lives of us. Again, what is their benefits to our outdoors? After many days of thinking about this, I have come up with nothing. They threaten our neighbors, kill our livestock, dogs, and wildlife. What do they give back to the ecosystem in which we live in? Nature viewing for the people thousands of miles away. They give National Geographic film footage and stories for their magazine. What do they provide to us? Insecurity is what they provide in my opinion. Before laws and special interest organizations, our forefathers eliminated the dangers around them. Why are we reversing those decisions now? I value a human life way more than the life a wolf. I apologize to those readers who disagree, but I also would love for you to give me logical feedback as to why we should continue to tolerate these dangerous animals.
Minnesota recently had delisted the wolf from the endangered species list and had introduced a management plan for regulated hunting seasons. However, due to a "technicality" in how the management documentation was submitted, the special interest groups appealed the delisting and the wolf became a protected animal again...not because the population was too small, not because the management plan was bad, but because of legal/political technicality. You can read here about the events around the Legal Status of wolves in MN. And while we wait for the legal system more livestock and dogs fall victim to these dangerous animals. And I walk through the woods with eyes on the back of my head.
Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against the species of animal. It is a beautiful and majestic animal. One of power and grace. And I do enjoy seeing wolves in controlled environments (zoo, nature reserve, etc.). I would just prefer they did not exist in the wild where humans are endangered.
If you have interests or are curious about wolf populations and what the state and the state's DNR (or Fish and Game departments) are doing, check out their websites:
Minnesota
Idaho
Montana
Wisconsin
Michigan
Wyoming
Washington
Oregon
Colorado
North and South Dakota do not have information on Wolves.
And for information from one of the many special interest groups, here is the Defenders of Wildlife about wolves.